2018-2022 Financial Plan
APPENDIX C: INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING STRATEGY
2010 Project Description
Highways 1,192,911
Sewage
Drainage
Water
Park
Borrow
Cost over 5 years
2823 232 St (116 - Slager)
Interest
Issue Cost
7074 112 Ave (232 St - 240 St) Final Lift 7133 203 St (123 Ave - Powell Ave) 7266 227 St @ Bypass (Traffic Signal)
207,385 615,448 109,150
6235 Parks Master Plan 7504 108 Ave (248 - 249)
40,000
29,634
82 136 Ave @ 24200 Rockridge Reservoir Ph 2 1914 Water Feeder Main Stage 2 Debt Payment
556,016 100,000
Payments from prior year borrowing
1,205,875
-
286,639
97,283
1,391,789
1925 Silver Valley Neighbourhood Se Horse
250,157
1,080,000 1,080,000
170,786 170,786
8,100 8,100
2010 Projects
3,330,769 2,124,894 1,205,875
29,634 29,634
286,639
753,299 656,016
1,681,947
Projects subtotal
-
40,000
Payments subtotal
- -
286,639
97,283
1,641,947
-
-
-
-
2011 Project Description
Highways
Sewage
Drainage 136,650 229,364
Water
Park
Borrow
Cost over 5 years
463 Selkirk Ave (226 - 227)
Interest
Issue Cost
6158 224 St (125 - 126)
841 Selkirk Ave (225 - 227)
343,706
2052 240 St @ Kanaka Creek (Bridge) 6178 Selkirk Ave (226 - 50M W 227) 6032 Whonnock Lake Phase 3 (Path/Light) 6075 Whonnock Lake Phase Iv Beach/General
1,313,280
10,288
227,800 227,446
7521 136 Ave (230 - 231)
25,735
1915 Water Feeder Main Stage 2 Debt Payment
100,000
Payments from prior year borrowing
1,205,875 1,216,765 4,089,914 1,667,274 2,422,640
-
286,639
97,283
1,641,947
2052 240 St @ Kanaka Creek (Bridge)
5,253,120 5,253,120
830,705 830,705
39,398 39,398
2011 Projects
25,735 25,735
652,653 366,014 286,639
197,283 100,000
2,097,193
Projects subtotal
455,246
Payments subtotal
- -
97,283
1,641,947
-
-
-
-
Totals for all years 2007-2011
Highways
Sewage
Drainage
Water
Park
Totals
Cost over 5 years
Projects subtotal
10,218,819 7,246,138 17,464,957
811,369
366,014
1,475,193
3,469,041 6,236,907 9,705,948
16,340,436 15,402,655 31,743,091
Payments subtotal
-
1,433,193 1,799,207
486,417
811,369
1,961,610
Principal Borrowed, and Full 5-year Costs
10,459,223
1,237,500
420,000
7,088,750
19,205,473
3,037,068
144,041
General Guidelines
The level of debt servicing and ongoing maintenance, operating and replacement costs should not hamper future ability to deal with cost increases related to current community services or growth-related increases in current services. A discussion about our capacity to manage ongoing costs associated with proposed new assets should take place during the capital review process, consistent with Financial Sustainability Policy (FSP) 12.0 10 , with replacement, maintenance and operating costs accommodated in accordance with FSP 7.0 and FSP 7.1. Borrowing should be limited to special cases, either because we can’t fund out of one year’s budget allocation, or where the project will be paid for over time (e.g. multiple years’ worth of operating revenue). The Financial Plan should be adjusted to reflect all aspects of the project, including revenue sources and cost savings. Debt financing will not be used to fund ongoing maintenance works, except for major maintenance works that cannot be funded from one year’s annual budget without negatively impacting the ability to perform other required maintenance works. In those cases, short-term debt financing will be considered, on the understanding that future year’s works will be limited by the amount of debt servicing required to fund the major projects done in earlier years. All projects to be funded by debt must “be submitted to Council with a business case, including recommendations on how the debt will be serviced.” (FSP 8.0) If debt financing is used to fund a project, performance measures should be established as part of a comprehensive project plan and progress will be reviewed by CMT on a quarterly basis beginning when the debt is issued. The performance measures should encompass cost-efficiency and effectiveness outcomes including project scope attainment. Upon project completion, a report should be provided illustrating achievement of objectives. It could also help to improve procedures and refine budgeting techniques by commenting on the process. Prior to the issuance of debt, an evaluation on our ability to manage the project internally will be completed to determine whether internal project management capacity is adequate for the project to proceed. If not, funding for outside project management support should be considered. Consider project timing. Interest costs are low right now, but construction costs are high and we may be paying a premium to compete with other major projects in the region. After these projects are completed, excess capacity may exist that could offset a rise in interest rate.
10 Financial Sustainability Plan Policy 5.52 contains thirteen policies to guide the District’s Financial Planning activities. Financial Sustainability Policies (FSPs) referenced in this document can be found in Appendix 5.
Page 212 of 234
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker